A Comparative Analysis of Stent Performance in Aneurysm: Impact of Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Flow Dynamics

Authors

  • Omi Dutta Department of Mechanical Engineering, CUET, Chattogram-4349, Bangladesh
  • Prasanjit Das Department of Mechanical Engineering, CUET, Chattogram-4349, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38032/scse.2026.4.39

Keywords:

Newtonian, Non-Newtonian, Stent, Shear thinning effect

Abstract

This study conducts a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis to evaluate stent performance in arterial aneurysms, focusing on the impact of Newtonian vs. non-Newtonian blood flow models, and stent design. The parameters which are used for the comparison are: pressure, velocity, wall shear stress and flow diversion. Simulations are done by using ANSYS FLUENT. There are three cases which are considered in this study: (i) Aneurysm without stent (ii) Aneurysm with a regular stent (iii) Aneurysm with a flow-diverter stent. The results show that non-Newtonian modeling yields more clinically realistic outcomes than Newtonian approximations. Because the non-Newtonian models consider the blood shear thinning effect and the viscosity changes in the artery length. The flow-diverter stent outperforms the regular stent, reducing intra-aneurysmal velocity by >99% and WSS by 98.5%, significantly lowering rupture risk. In case of Newtonian models, a regular stent allows the more of the blood to flow into the aneurysm whereas the flow diverter stent reduces more of so that it is more useful than the regular stent. But for the non-Newtonian models, the flow diverter couldn’t reduce as much flow like the case of Newtonian models. The non-Newtonian models show a more realistic blood flow simulation. In these cases, patient specific stent designs are needed for the aneurysm treatment. This research contributes to understanding the flow of blood into the artery and aneurysm both for Newtonian and non-Newtonian flow dynamics.

Downloads

Downloads

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] W. Wu, S. Tanweer, R. K. A. Tapia-Orihuela, P. Munjal, Y. V. Trivedi, S. Zhao, H. Zafar, H. Darapaneni, V. S. Dasari, C. Lee, R. R. Bhat, G. S. Kassab, and Y. S. Chatzizisis, “Hemodynamic microenvironment of coronary stent strut malapposition,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 184, p. 109378, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109378

[2] B. J. Chung and J. R. Cebral, “CFD for evaluation and treatment planning of aneurysms: Review of proposed clinical uses and their challenges,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 122–138, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-014-1093-6

[3] M. D. Ford, H. N. Nikolov, J. S. Milner, S. P. Lownie, E. M. DeMont, W. Kalata, F. Loth, D. W. Holdsworth, and D. A. Steinman, “PIV-measured versus CFD-predicted flow dynamics in anatomically realistic cerebral aneurysm models,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 130, no. 2, p. 021015, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2900724

[4] S. A. Vargas, C. Diaz, D. A. Herrera, and A. B. Dublin, “Intracranial aneurysms in children: The role of stenting and flow-diversion,” Journal of Neuroimaging, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 41–45, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jon.12305

[5] S. Islam, X. Song, E. T. Choi, J. Kim, H. Liu, and A. Kim, “In vitro study on smart stent for autonomous post-endovascular aneurysm repair surveillance,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 96340–96346, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2996506

[6] J. A. W. Teijink, A. H. Power, D. Böckler, P. Peeters, S. van Sterkenburg, L. H. Bouwman, H. J. Verhagen, M. Bosiers, V. Riambau, J. P. Becquemin, P. Cuypers, and M. van Sambeek, “Five-year outcomes of the Endurant stent graft for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the ENGAGE registry,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 175–181, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.01.008

[7] B. Catalán-Echeverría, M. E. Kelly, L. Peeling, D. Bergstrom, X. Chen, and M. Malvè, “CFD-based comparison study of a new flow diverting stent and commercially-available ones for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms,” Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 7, p. 1341, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app9071341

[8] N. Korei, A. Solouk, M. H. Nazarpak, and A. Nouri, “A review on design characteristics and fabrication methods of metallic cardiovascular stents,” Materials Today Communications, vol. 31, p. 103467, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103467

[9] T. Shintani, H. Obara, K. Matsubara, K. Hayashi, M. Hayashi, S. Ono, T. Shimogawara, S. Shibutani, S. Watada, Y. Sekimoto, N. Uchida, A. Asami, T. Fujii, H. Harada, N. Fujimura, Y. Sato, and Y. Kitagawa, “Impact of stent graft design on external iliac artery limb occlusion rates after endovascular aneurysm repair: Post-hoc analysis of a Japanese multicenter database,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 839–847, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.03.025

[10] E. Soudah, E. Y. K. Ng, T. H. Loong, M. Bordone, U. Pua, and S. Narayanan, “CFD modelling of abdominal aortic aneurysm on hemodynamic loads using a realistic geometry with CT,” Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, vol. 2013, Article ID 472564, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/472564

[11] C. Wang, Z. Tian, J. Liu, L. Jing, N. Paliwal, S. Wang, Y. Zhang, J. Xiang, A. H. Siddiqui, H. Meng, and X. Yang, “Flow diverter effect of LVIS stent on cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: A comparison with Enterprise stents and the Pipeline device,” Journal of Translational Medicine, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 199, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-016-0959-9

[12] A. F. Sanches, S. Shit, Y. Özpeynirci, and T. Liebig, “CFD to quantify idealized intra-aneurysmal blood flow in response to regular and flow diverter stent treatment,” Fluids, vol. 7, no. 8, p. 254, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids7080254

[13] S. B. Islami, M. Wesolowski, W. Revell, and X. Chen, “Virtual reality visualization of CFD simulated blood flow in cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diverter stents,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 17, p. 8082, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11178082

Published

02.08.2026

How to Cite

[1]
O. Dutta and P. Das, “A Comparative Analysis of Stent Performance in Aneurysm: Impact of Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Flow Dynamics”, SCS:Engineering, vol. 4, pp. 63–67, Aug. 2026, doi: 10.38032/scse.2026.4.39.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 63

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.