Computational Analysis of Aerodynamic Performance in Conventional and Bio-Inspired Tubercled Aircraft Wings

Mehrab Hossen; Sifat Perves; Farhan Sadik Rafi

doi:10.38032/scse.2026.4.65

Authors

Mehrab Hossen Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Military Institute of Science and Technology (MIST), Dhaka, Bangladesh
Sifat Perves Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Military Institute of Science and Technology (MIST), Dhaka, Bangladesh
Farhan Sadik Rafi Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Military Institute of Science and Technology (MIST), Dhaka, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38032/scse.2026.4.65

Keywords:

Bio-Inspired Aerodynamics, Naca 2412, CFD Simulation, Tubercled Leading Edge, Stall Delay

Abstract

This research undertakes a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation of the aerodynamic effectiveness of a standard NACA 2412 wing and one of its modifications, which is bio-inspired and has a tubercled leading edge. Fluent steady-state simulations with 20 m/s and 30 m/s freestream velocities and a range of -6° to 24° angles of attack were analyzed through the k–ω SST turbulence model. Results show that although the conventional wing outperforms the modified wing at lower to moderate angles of attack, the tubercled configuration significantly improves post-stall performance, leading to delayed stall and drag reduction of up to 45% at high angles of attack. Unlike the baseline wing, the tubercled wing’s lift-to-drag ratio surpasses 20 even after a 15° angle of attack at 30 m/s. Structural studies show the altered pressure distributions resulted in a 20–21% increase in maximum deformation. The results reinforce the aerodynamic advantages of tubercled leading edges in agility and stall resistance, while showing the need for aeroelastic design optimization to control excessive deformation.

Downloads

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Y. Lu, Z. Li, X. Chang, Z. Chuang, and J. Xing, “An aerodynamic optimization design study on the bio-inspired airfoil with leading-edge tubercles,” Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 292–312, Jan. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19942060.2020.1856723

[2] I. Ali, T. Hussain, I. N. Unar, L. Kumar, and I. U. Ahad, “Turbulence model study for aerodynamic analysis of the leading edge tubercle wing for low Reynolds number flows,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 11, p. e32148, May 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32148

[3] H. Kim, J. Kim, and H. Choi, “Flow structure modifications by leading-edge tubercles on a 3D wing,” Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, vol. 13, no. 6, p. 066011, Oct. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/aae6fc

[4] A. Mahato, M. Thangadurai, S. Atwal, and S. C. Rana, “Effect of leading edge tubercles on the aerodynamic performance of a symmetrical airfoil at subsonic flows,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 37, no. 5, May 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0266689

[5] S. A. A. Mamun, “Aerodynamic Performance Enhancement of Low Aspect Ratio Military Drone Aircraft Wing through Employing Leading Edge Tubercles,” International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, vol. 6, no. 1, Feb. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.11628

[6] D. Wang et al., “Impact of Leading-Edge tubercles on Airfoil aerodynamic performance and flow patterns at different Reynolds numbers,” Energies, vol. 17, no. 21, p. 5518, Nov. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17215518

[7] X. Guo, J. Xu, Y. Huang, and D. Cao, “Aerodynamic characterization of leading-edge tubercles bionic airfoils with different configurations at high Reynolds number,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 36, no. 12, Dec. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0243806

[8] R. Bardera, Á. A. Rodríguez-Sevillano, E. Barroso-Barderas, and J. C. Matías-García, “CFD study of the effect of leading-edge tubercles on the aerodynamic characteristics of a small UAV based on eppler 186 airfoils,” Results in Engineering, vol. 23, p. 102639, Aug. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102639

[9] Z. Wei, J. W. A. Toh, I. H. Ibrahim, and Y. Zhang, “Aerodynamic characteristics and surface flow structures of moderate aspect-ratio leading-edge tubercled wings,” European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids, vol. 75, pp. 143–152, Jan. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2019.01.001

[10] G. Moscato, J. Mohamed, and G. P. Romano, “Improving performances of biomimetic wings with leading-edge tubercles,” Experiments in Fluids, vol. 63, no. 9, Aug. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-022-03493-8

[11] V. T. Gopinathan and J. B. R. Rose, “Aerodynamic performance investigation of sweptback wings with bio-inspired leading-edge tubercles,” International Journal of Modern Physics C, vol. 33, no. 03, Oct. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129183122500358

[12] J. M. McKegney, X. Shen, C. Zhu, B. Xu, L. Yang, and L. Dala, “Bio-inspired design of leading-edge tubercles on wind turbine blades,” 7th Int. Conf. Environment Friendly Energies Appl., Dec. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EFEA56675.2022.10063814

[13] D. Miklosovic, M. Murray, L. Howle, and F. Fish, “Leading-edge tubercles delay stall on humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae flippers,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. L39–L42, May 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1688341

[14] K.L. Hansen, R.M. Kelso, and B.B. Dally, “Performance variations of leading-edge tubercles for distinct airfoil profiles,” AIAA Journal, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 185–194, Jan. 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J050631