Numerical Analysis of Supersonic Flow and Shockwave Behavior Over a Convex Wedge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38032/scse.2025.3.170Keywords:
SSD (Shock Standoff Distance), Convex Wedge, Supersonic flow, CFD, Bow shockAbstract
The present study describes the flow behavior around the leading edge of a convex wedge having a specific dimension under varying upstream Mach numbers ranging from 1.4 to 2. The interaction between the free stream flow and the wedge significantly affects flow parameters such as static pressure, density, static temperature, downstream Mach number, and shock standoff distance (SSD), which are crucial for efficient aerodynamic design. Previously, various researchers have considered the convex wedge flow configuration specifically for inviscid flow but limited attention has been given to the detailed behavior of flow parameters at the leading edge of a convex wedge under varying upstream Mach numbers. The results indicate that, static pressure increased almost 80% at upstream Mach number 2 at the leading edge of the convex wedge. Density, static temperature, downstream Mach number all of them increased by 40%, 28%, and 40% respectively. The downstream Mach number, at first increases slowly but change takes place rather rapidly when the upstream Mach number crosses the value of 1.6. Again, the SSD showed an abrupt change (almost 95% decrease of its initial value at upstream Mach number 2). The leading edge was chosen for this study since it’s considered to be the critical design point which experiences the highest thermal and aerodynamic loads due to the shockwave. Evaluating flow behavior at this point is crucial in managing shockwave-induced loads.
Downloads
Downloads
Downloads
References
[1] Oosthuizen P.H., Carscallen W. E. Compressible Fluid Flow. THE McGRAW-HILL COMPANIES, INC.; 1997.
[2] Surujhlal D, Skews BW. Two-dimensional supersonic flow over concave surfaces. Shock Waves 2018;28:1199–205.
[3] Worku Z, Timofeev E, Mölder S. Estimation of Shock Stand-off Distance Using the Curved Shock Theory and Its Validation via Numerical Modelling. 2018.
[4] Mishra A, Khan A, Musfirah Mazlan N. Determination of shock standoff distance for wedge at supersonic flow. International Journal of Engineering, Transactions A: Basics 2019;32:1049–56.
[5] Zore K, Ozcer I, Munholand L, Stokes J. ANSYS CFD Simulations of Supersonic and Hypersonic Flows. n.d.
[6] Khan SA, Aabid A, Mokashi I, Al-Robaian AA, Alsagri AS. CFD Letters Optimization of Two-dimensional Wedge Flow Field at Supersonic Mach Number. CFD Letters 2019;11:80–97.
[7] Shaikh JS, Kumar K, Pathan KA, Khan SA. Computational Analysis of Surface Pressure Distribution over a 2DWedge in the Supersonic and Hypersonic Flow Regimes. Fluid Dynamics and Materials Processing 2023;19:1637–53.
[8] Kumar G, De A. Role of corner flow separation in unsteady dynamics of hypersonic flow over a double wedge geometry. Physics of Fluids 2021;33.
[9] Weng Y, Li Q, Tan G, Su W, You Y. Numerical investigations on interactions between 2D/3D conical shock wave and axisymmetric boundary layer at Ma=2.2. Aerosp Sci Technol 2024;144.
[10] Khan SA, Aabid A. CFD Simulation with Analytical and Theoretical Validation of Different Flow Parameters for the Wedge at Supersonic Mach Number. vol. 19. 2019.
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nobin Dhar , Mohammad Ilias Inam, Azizul Hakim Aakash (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All the articles published by this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
