Albatross and Peregrine Falcon Flight Inspired Biomimetic Wing Design: A Comparison with NACA 23015

Authors

  • Anish Deb Turjo Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology, Chattogram-4349, Bangladesh
  • Chandrima Deb Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology, Chattogram-4349, Bangladesh
  • Mamjad Yousuf Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology, Chattogram-4349, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38032/scse.2026.4.96

Keywords:

Peregrine Falcon, Albatross, Bioinspired design, CFD simulation, NACA airfoil

Abstract

Innovations in engineering, especially in the area of aerodynamics, have historically been inspired by nature. Birds have evolved incredibly effective wing structures that maximize lift, minimize drag, and enable adaptation to various flight circumstances. In this study, we combine several important aerodynamic traits from two amazing bird species to create a bioinspired wing: the Peregrine Falcon, the fastest bird in the world, which is renowned for its agility and capacity for high-speed maneuvers, and the Albatross, which is praised for its unmatched gliding efficiency. The 3D model of the wing was developed in Solidworks, meticulously integrating the high aspect ratio and tapered tips seen in the Albatross, alongside the swept-back design of the Peregrine Falcon. This model was then analyzed in ANSYS Fluent at a Reynolds number of 6 × 105 and an inlet velocity of 29.78 m/s, using the NACA 23015 wing as a reference. The results show that the Albatross & Falcon (A&F) wing peaked at an angle of 5°, while the NACA 23015 reached its maximum lift-to-drag ratio at 15°, showing a 33% gain in aerodynamic efficiency and a delayed stall beyond 15°. The pressure contours showed less flow separation and more efficient airflow. These findings imply that adding biomimetic components could greatly increase lift output and stability, creating chances for the creation of more nimble and fuel-efficient aircraft and UAV designs.

Downloads

Downloads

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] S. Yuvaraj, A. Adithya, G. Banu, and S. Srithar, “Numerical and experimental investigation of airfoil derived from peregrine FALCON,” Measurement: Sensors, vol. 31, no. October 2023, p. 100956, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.measen.2023.100956. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2023.100956

[2] P. L. Richardson, E. D. Wakefield, and R. A. Phillips, “Flight speed and performance of the wandering albatross with respect to wind,” Movement Ecology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2018, doi: 10.1186/s40462-018-0121-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-018-0121-9

[3] B. Ponitz, A. Schmitz, D. Fischer, H. Bleckmann, and C. Brücker, “Diving-flight aerodynamics of a peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus),” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 2, 2014, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086506

[4] B. C. Mathew, J. V. M. Lal Jeyan, P. Dutta, and R. R. Savale, “Evolutionary and Hereditary Traits of an Albatross and its Aerodynamic Optimality,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 775, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/775/1/012002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/775/1/012002

[5] H. Zhang, S. Zhang, and T. Xiang, “Effects of Bio-Inspired Wing Dihedral Variations on Dynamic Soaring Performance of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles,” Drones, vol. 8, no. 11, 2024, doi: 10.3390/drones8110623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/drones8110623

[6] A. Kulshreshtha, S. K. Gupta, and P. Singhal, “FEM/CFD analysis of wings at different angle of attack,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 26, no. July, pp. 1638–1643, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.342

[7] J. V. N. de Sousa et al., On the Study of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles by Computational Fluid-Dynamics, vol. 10, no. 01. 2020. doi: 10.4236/ojfd.2020.101005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojfd.2020.101005

[8] J. P. Barnes, “How flies the albatross - the flight mechanics of dynamic soaring,” SAE Technical Papers, no. 724, 2004, doi: 10.4271/2004-01-3088. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/2004-01-3088

[9] O. Selim, E. R. Gowree, C. Lagemann, E. Talboys, C. Jagadeesh, and C. Brücker, “Peregrine Falcon’s Dive: Pullout Maneuver and Flight Control Through Wing Morphing,” AIAA Journal, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 3979–3987, 2021, doi: 10.2514/1.J060052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J060052

[10] B. Duan, J. Liu, S. Wang, Z. Chen, and B. Ju, “Wind Tunnel Experimental Study on the Flight Parameters of a Bio-Inspired Bat-like Flapping-Wing Robot,” Aerospace, vol. 12, no. 7, 2025, doi: 10.3390/aerospace12070615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12070615

[11] X. Bai, H. Zhan, and B. Mi, “Unsteady Aerodynamic Design of a Flapping Wing Combined with a Bionic Wavy Leading Edge,” Applied Sciences (Switzerland), vol. 13, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.3390/app13031519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13031519

[12] P. L. Richardson, “How do albatrosses fly around the world without flapping their wings?,” Progress in Oceanography, vol. 88, no. 1–4, pp. 46–58, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2010.08.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2010.08.001

[13] E. R. Gowree, C. Jagadeesh, E. Talboys, C. Lagemann, and C. Brücker, “Vortices enable the complex aerobatics of peregrine falcons,” Communications Biology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2018, doi: 10.1038/s42003-018-0029-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-018-0029-3

Published

02.08.2026

How to Cite

[1]
A. D. Turjo, C. Deb, and M. Yousuf, “Albatross and Peregrine Falcon Flight Inspired Biomimetic Wing Design: A Comparison with NACA 23015”, SCS:Engineering, vol. 4, pp. 177–183, Aug. 2026, doi: 10.38032/scse.2026.4.96.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 124

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.