Investigation on the Bending Characteristics of Variable Thickness Negative Stiffness Honeycomb Core
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38032/scse.2026.4.199Keywords:
Honeycomb Structure, Double Curved Beam, Specific Energy Absorption, Negative Stiffness, Peak ForceAbstract
This study investigates the bending behavior and energy absorption capacity of negative stiffness honeycomb cores with variable thickness under flexural loading. The objective is to improve structural performance by introducing local beam thickness modification in three models (LM1, LM2, and LM3) and by varying the initial beam height (h = 2.8-9 mm). Both experimental testing and finite element simulations using Abaqus CAE were conducted, with validation confirming good agreement between experimental and simulation results. Among the locally modified models, LM3 demonstrated the best overall performance, achieving the highest peak force and the greatest specific energy absorption (SEA). This corresponds to a 29 % increase in peak force and a 25.6 % improvement in SEA compared to the baseline constant-thickness core. Although LM3 showed sudden post-peak drops, its superior strength and energy dissipation make it well-suited for applications requiring high impact resistance. Furthermore, varying the initial beam height to 8 mm significantly enhanced the performance, delivering up to 95 % higher peak force and 142 % greater SEA. Overall, the results highlight the potential of functionally graded honeycomb cores for crash protection, aerospace, and vibration isolation systems.
Downloads
Downloads
Downloads
References
[1] V. N. Burlayenko and T. Sadowski, “Effective elastic properties of foam-filled honeycomb cores of sandwich panels,” Composite Structures, vol. 92, no. 12, pp. 2890–2900, Nov. 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.04.015
[2] T. Khan, V. Acar, M. R. Aydin, B. Hülagü, H. Akbulut, and M. Ö. Seydibeyoğlu, “A review on recent advances in sandwich structures based on polyurethane foam cores,” Polymer Composites, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 2355–2400, June 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.25543
[3] J.-H. Lee, S.-H. Kang, Y.-J. Ha, and S.-G. Hong, “Structural Behavior of Durable Composite Sandwich Panels with High Performance Expanded Polystyrene Concrete,” Int J Concr Struct Mater, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 21, Dec. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-018-0255-6
[4] H. Taghipoor and M. Sefidi, “Energy absorption of foam-filled corrugated core sandwich panels under quasi-static loading,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications, vol. 237, no. 1, pp. 234–246, Jan. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14644207221110483
[5] Y. Feng, H. Qiu, Y. Gao, H. Zheng, and J. Tan, “Creative design for sandwich structures: A review,” International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, vol. 17, no. 3, p. 1729881420921327, May 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1729881420921327
[6] T. Li and L. Wang, “Bending behavior of sandwich composite structures with tunable 3D-printed core materials,” Composite Structures, vol. 175, pp. 46–57, Sept. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.001
[7] F. Tarlochan, “Sandwich Structures for Energy Absorption Applications: A Review,” Materials, vol. 14, no. 16, p. 4731, Aug. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164731
[8] H. Yazdani Sarvestani, A. H. Akbarzadeh, A. Mirbolghasemi, and K. Hermenean, “3D printed meta-sandwich structures: Failure mechanism, energy absorption and multi-hit capability,” Materials & Design, vol. 160, pp. 179–193, Dec. 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.08.061
[9] K. Che, C. Yuan, J. Wu, H. Jerry Qi, and J. Meaud, “Three-Dimensional-Printed Multistable Mechanical Metamaterials With a Deterministic Deformation Sequence,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, vol. 84, no. 1, p. 011004, Jan. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4034706
[10] T. A. M. Hewage, K. L. Alderson, A. Alderson, and F. Scarpa, “Double‐Negative Mechanical Metamaterials Displaying Simultaneous Negative Stiffness and Negative Poisson’s Ratio Properties,” Advanced Materials, vol. 28, no. 46, pp. 10323–10332, Dec. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201603959
[11] Z. Meng, Z. Ouyang, and C. Q. Chen, “Multi-step metamaterials with two phases of elastic and plastic deformation,” Composite Structures, vol. 271, p. 114152, Sept. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114152
[12] X. Tan et al., “Reusable metamaterial via inelastic instability for energy absorption,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 155, pp. 509–517, May 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.02.011
[13] S. Chen et al., “A novel gradient negative stiffness honeycomb for recoverable energy absorption,” Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 215, p. 108745, June 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108745
[14] A. Zhakatayev, Z. Kappassov, and H. A. Varol, “Analytical modeling and design of negative stiffness honeycombs,” Smart Mater. Struct., vol. 29, no. 4, p. 045024, Apr. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab773a
[15] S. Besari, “Snap-Through Buckling Problem of Spherical Shell Structure,” vol. 8, 2015.
[16] A. Pandey, D. E. Moulton, D. Vella, and D. P. Holmes, “Dynamics of snapping beams and jumping poppers,” EPL, vol. 105, no. 2, p. 24001, Jan. 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/105/24001
[17] W. Simpkins, M. G. Hennessy, and M. Taffetani, “Snap-through time of arches is controlled by slenderness and imperfections,” Aug. 14, 2025, arXiv: arXiv:2508.10802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/4vh7-2ztw
[18] N. Aewzipo, S. Olarnrithinun, and S. Aimmanee, “Functionally varied negative-stiffness metamaterial core sandwich structures with three-phase bending deformation,” Smart Mater. Struct., vol. 33, no. 5, p. 055018, May 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ad37b6
[19] D. M. Correa, T. Klatt, S. Cortes, M. Haberman, D. Kovar, and C. Seepersad, “Negative stiffness honeycombs for recoverable shock isolation,” Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 193–200, Mar. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-12-2014-0182
[20] B. A. Fulcher, D. W. Shahan, M. R. Haberman, C. Conner Seepersad, and P. S. Wilson, “Analytical and Experimental Investigation of Buckled Beams as Negative Stiffness Elements for Passive Vibration and Shock Isolation Systems,” Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, vol. 136, no. 3, p. 031009, June 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4026888
[21] D. M. Correa, C. C. Seepersad, and M. R. Haberman, “Mechanical design of negative stiffness honeycomb materials,” Integr Mater Manuf Innov, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 165–175, Dec. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40192-015-0038-8
[22] S. Chen et al., “A novel composite negative stiffness structure for recoverable trapping energy,” Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, vol. 129, p. 105697, Feb. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105697
[23] Prof. O. de Weck and Dr. I. Y. Kim, “Engineering Design and Rapid Prototyping,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Jan. 12, 2004. Accessed: Oct. 11, 2025. [Online]. Available: http://web.mit.edu/16.810/www/16.810_L4_CAE.pdf.
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bickrom Saha , Md Arifuzzaman , Devashis Bagchi , Md Roknuzzaman , Md Shariful Islam (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All the articles published by this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
How to Cite
