Investigation of Ionizing Radiation Shielding and Mechanical Properties of Tin-Based Metal Alloys

Abdullah Al Mamun; Md. Sanaul Rabbi

doi:10.38032/scse.2026.4.233

Authors

Abdullah Al Mamun Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology, Chattogram-4349, Bangladesh
Md. Sanaul Rabbi Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology, Chattogram-4349, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38032/scse.2026.4.233

Keywords:

Gamma Shielding, EpiXS, Mechanical Strength, Stir Casting, Lead-free

Abstract

The growing use of ionizing radiation in industrial, medical and nuclear sectors demands effective and eco-friendly shielding materials. In this study, Sn-based alloys (Sn-Cu-Ni, Sn-Ni-Zn, and Sn-Cu-Zn) were synthesized by stir casting and evaluated for their gamma-ray shielding and mechanical properties. Shielding performance was assessed with the EpiXS program, which provided parameters such as the mass and linear attenuation coefficients, mean free path, half-value layer, effective atomic number, and electron density across photon energies from 59.5 to 1332 keV, covering common sources including Am-241, Co-57, Ba-133, Cs-137, and Co-60. The computational results closely matched NIST XCOM values, with deviations below 0.32%. Among the alloys Sn-Cu-Zn performed best at low energies due to its higher atomic number, while Sn-Ni-Zn maintained balanced attenuation over the entire range. Mechanical testing indicated that Sn-Cu-Zn had the highest strength and hardness but limited toughness, whereas Sn-Cu-Ni showed superior impact resistance. Sn-Ni-Zn, though mechanically weaker, proved effective against high-energy photons. These results suggest that alloy composition can be tailored to meet specific shielding needs in diagnostic, therapeutic, or structural applications.

Downloads

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] A. Samarin, “Use of concrete as a biological shield from ionising radiation,” Sustain. Constr. Mater. Technol., vol. 2013-Augus, no. 2, pp. 90–97, 2013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/eee.2013.010208

[2] L. Huang and Z. Fu, “Effect of Al Content on Microstructure and Mechanical Behavior of AsCastNi35(CoCr)62-xAlxTi3High-Entropy Alloys,” 75th World Foundry Congr. WFC 2024, pp. 154–155, 2024

[3] Z. X. Zhao et al., “Effect of Sn content on the microstructure, mechanical properties and corrosion behavior of biodegradable Mg-x (1, 3 and 5 wt.%) Sn-1Zn-0.5Ca alloys,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 1–14, 2018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11122378

[4] I. Akkurt, H. Akyildirim, B. Mavi, S. Kilincarslan, and C. Basyigit, “Gamma-ray shielding properties of concrete including barite at different energies,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 620–623, 2010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2010.04.006

[5] A. M. Reda and A. A. El-Daly, “Gamma ray shielding characteristics of Sn-20Bi and Sn-20Bi-0.4Cu lead-free alloys,” Prog. Nucl. Energy, vol. 123, p. 103304, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2020.103304

[6] U. Perişanoğlu, E. Kavaz, H. O. Tekin, S. R. Armoosh, N. Ekinci, and M. Oltulu, “Comparison of gamma and neutron shielding competences of Fe–Cu- and brass-added Portland cement pastes: an experimental and Monte Carlo study,” Appl. Phys. A, vol. 126, no. 6, p. 470, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-020-03648-6

[7] E.-S. A. Waly, M. A. Fusco, and M. A. Bourham, “Gamma-ray mass attenuation coefficient and half value layer factor of some oxide glass shielding materials,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, vol. 96, pp. 26–30, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.05.028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.05.028

[8] M. Arif Sazali, N. K. Alang Md Rashid, and K. Hamzah, “A review on multilayer radiation shielding,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 555, no. 1, 2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/555/1/012008

[9] Y. Kim, S. Park, and Y. Seo, “Enhanced X-ray Shielding Ability of Polymer–Nonleaded Metal Composites by Multilayer Structuring,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 54, no. 22, pp. 5968–5973, Jun. 2015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b00425

[10] S. Park, H. Kim, Y. Kim, E. Kim, and Y. Seo, “Multilayer-Structured Non-leaded Metal/Polymer Composites for Enhanced X-ray Shielding,” MRS Adv., vol. 3, no. 31, pp. 1789–1797, 2018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/adv.2018.336

[11] S. K. Das and S. H. Dhobi, “Radiation Shielding Properties of Nickel, Copper and Iron Based Alloys,” Patan Prospect. J., vol. 4, no. 01, pp. 118–134, 2024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/ppj.v4i01.70210

[12] T. Wu et al., “Enhanced mechanical strength of Cu-Sn alloy by Mg addition,” Mater. Res. Express, vol. 8, no. 1, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/abde11

[13] B. L. Silva and J. E. Spinelli, “Correlations of microstructure and mechanical properties of the ternary Sn-9wt%Zn2wt%Cu solder alloy,” Mater. Res., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2017-0877

[14] C. V. More, Z. Alsayed, M. S. Badawi, A. A. Thabet, and P. P. Pawar, Polymeric composite materials for radiation shielding: a review, vol. 19, no. 3. Springer International Publishing, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-021-01189-9

[15] S. E. Susilowati, A. Fudholi, and D. Sumardiyanto, “Mechanical and microstructural characteristics of Cu–Sn–Zn/ Gr metal matrix composites processed by powder metallurgy for bearing materials,” Results Eng., vol. 14, no. February, p. 100377, 2022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100377

[16] W. Gao, D. Cao, Y. Jin, X. Zhou, G. Cheng, and Y. Wang, “Composite Coatings on Mild Steel,” pp. 1–21.

[17] C. Hou et al., “Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of As-Aged Mg-Zn-Sn-Mn-Al Alloys,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010109

[18] S. U. Ayuba, O. S. I. Fayomi, and O. A. Omotosho, “Experimental investigation of nanomechanical response from synergistic metal alloy fusion of Cu-Al-Zn-Sn for anti-corrosion and structural application,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 132, no. 11–12, pp. 5621–5632, 2024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-024-13669-7

[19] K. Maki, Y. Ito, H. Matsunaga, and H. Mori, “Solid-solution copper alloys with high strength and high electrical conductivity,” Scr. Mater., vol. 68, no. 10, pp. 777–780, 2013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.12.027

[20] E. Şakar, Ö. F. Özpolat, B. Alım, M. I. Sayyed, and M. Kurudirek, “Phy-X / PSD: Development of a user friendly online software for calculation of parameters relevant to radiation shielding and dosimetry,” Radiat. Phys. Chem., vol. 166, p. 108496, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.108496

[21] K. M. Abdulazeez and W. A. Sheekhoo, “Synergistic radiation shielding performance of Cu-based ternary alloys for multifunctional gamma , beta , and neutron radiation protection,” vol. 123, pp. 29–39, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-025-06802-2

[22] G. F. Knoll, Radiation detection and measurement. New York, NY: Wiley, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://cds.cern.ch/record/1300754

[23] M. Mikolajčík, L. Kuchariková, E. Tillová, J. M. Sanchez, Z. Šurdová, and M. Chalupová, “Influence of Copper Addition on the Mechanical Properties and Corrosion Resistance of Self-Hardening Secondary Aluminium Alloy AlZn10Si8Mg,” Metals (Basel)., vol. 14, no. 7, 2024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/met14070776

[24] I. N. Qader, M. Kok, and Z. D. Cirak, “The effects of substituting Sn for Ni on the thermal and some other characteristics of NiTiSn shape memory alloys,” J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., vol. 145, no. 2, pp. 279–288, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09758-w

[25] B. Alloy, “Babbitt Alloy,” 2024.