Environmental Sustainability of Waste-Derived Adsorbent: Insights from Life Cycle Assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38032/scse.2026.4.135Keywords:
Life Cycle Assessment, Environmental impact, Adsorbents, Activated Carbon, Waste RecyclingAbstract
Activated carbon has grabbed attention of the researchers. Activated carbon production results in sustainability challenges, as it is heavily dependent on feedstocks which are fossil based. Besides, the steps require high energy. This research carries out a cradle to gate Life Cycle Assessment to compare AC derived from coconut shell with commercial AC. LCA focuses on climate change as well as overall Sustainability outcome. The precursor coconut shells were carbonized at 500-600 ºC. Afterwards; chemical activation was carried out using KOH. Inventory modeling was performed in OpenLCA 1.11 using the Ecoinvent 3.9 database. The results from LCA analysis indicates coconut-shell AC achieves mentionable reduction in environmental impacts. Results include a 66% lower global warming potential and a 70% decrease in particulate matter formation. Reduced energy consumption, renewable feedstock origin are reason for such benefits. Nonetheless, higher ecotoxicity impacts were observed due to the use of chemical activating agents, suggesting the need for more sustainable alternatives. Overall, the study confirms that biomass-derived AC offers a promising low-carbon route. Therefore; alignment with circular economy principles and advancing sustainable material development is found.
Downloads
Downloads
Downloads
References
[1] N. Arena, "Life cycle assessment of activated carbon production from coconut shells in Indonesia," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 139, pp. 1–10, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.073
[2] A. Vilén, "Comparative life cycle assessment of activated carbon production from various raw materials," Science of The Total Environment, vol. 803, p. 149975, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116356
[3] E. logic, "Life cycle assessment of supercapacitor electrodes based on activated carbon from coconut shells," ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1673–1682, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c03239
[4] J. Saleem, "Effect of acid activation, water, and fuel on the environmental impact of coconut shell-derived activated carbon," Materials, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 22, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/c11010022
[5] H. Gu, "Life-cycle assessment of activated carbon from biomass: A comparative study," Wood and Fiber Science, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 1–10, 2018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22382/wfs-2018-024
[6] Finnveden, G., Albertsson, A.C., Berendson, J., Eriksson, E., Höglund, L.O., Karlsson, S. and Sundqvist, J.O., “Solid waste treatment within the framework of life-cycle assessment,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 3(4), pp. 189-199, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-6526(95)00081-X
[7] International Organization for Standardization. Environmental management: life cycle assessment; Principles and Framework. ISO, 2006.
[8] K. K. Moradiya, C. Srisangari, S. V. Jadhav, and K. V. Marathe, “Life cycle assessment of a common effluent treatment plant: Case study of Mahad, India,” Waste Manag. Bull., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 67–74, Apr. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wmb.2023.12.006
[9] Sims, R.E., Rogner, H.H. and Gregory, K., “Carbon emission and mitigation cost comparisons between fossil fuel, nuclear and renewable energy resources for electricity generation,” Energy policy, vol. 31(13), pp. 1315-1326, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00192-1
[10] Lewtas, J., “Air pollution combustion emissions: characterization of causative agents and mechanisms associated with cancer, reproductive, and cardiovascular effects,” Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research, vol. 636(1-3), pp.95-133, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2007.08.003
[11] Belluati, M., Tabasso, S., Gaudino, E.C., Cravotto, G. and Manzoli, M., “Biomass-derived carbon-based catalysts for lignocellulosic biomass and waste valorisation: a circular approach. Green Chemistry, vol. 26(15), pp. 8642-8668, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D4GC00606B
[12] Güleroğlu, H. and Yumurtacı, Z., “Life Cycle Assessment of Green Methanol Production Based on Multi-Seasonal Modeling of Hybrid Renewable Energy and Storage Systems,” Sustainability, vol. 17(2), pp. 624, 2025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020624
[13] Clauser, Nicolas, Corinne D. Scown, Jennifer Pett-Ridge, and William Joe Sagues. "A techno-economic assessment of carbon dioxide removal pathways via biochemical conversion of lignocellulose to biofuels and bioplastics." Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 216, p. 115714,2025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115714
[14] Kwilinski, Aleksy, Oleksii Lyulyov, and Tetyana Pimonenko. "Reducing transport sector CO2 emissions patterns: Environmental technologies and renewable energy." Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, vol.10, no. 1, p. 100217,2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100217
[15] Di Filippo, Rocco, Oreste S. Bursi, and Rosa Di Maggio. "Global warming and ozone depletion potentials caused by emissions from HFC and CFC banks due to structural damage." Energy and buildings, vol. 273,p. 112385, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112385
[16] van den Oever, Anne EM, Stefano Puricelli, Daniele Costa, Nils Thonemann, Maeva Lavigne Philippot, and Maarten Messagie. "Revisiting the challenges of ozone depletion in life cycle assessment." Cleaner Environmental Systems, vol. 13, p. 100196, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100196
[17] Liao, Mochen, Stephen Kelley, and Yuan Yao. "Generating energy and greenhouse gas inventory data of activated carbon production using machine learning and kinetic based process simulation." ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering vol. 8, no. 2, p. 1252-1261, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06522
[18] Saleem, Muhammad. "Possibility of utilizing agriculture biomass as a renewable and sustainable future energy source." Heliyon vol. 8, no. 2, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08905
[19] Sangkham, Sarawut, Worradorn Phairuang, Samendra P. Sherchan, Nattapon Pansakun, Narongsuk Munkong, Kritsada Sarndhong, Md Aminul Islam, and Pornpun Sakunkoo. "An update on adverse health effects from exposure to PM2. 5." Environmental Advances, vol. 18, p. 100603, 2024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2024.100603
[20] Kondo, Kayoko, Leslie Mabon, Yifan Bi, Yulin Chen, and Yuriko Hayabuchi. "Balancing conflicting mitigation and adaptation behaviours of urban residents under climate change and the urban heat island effect." Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 65 p. 102585, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102585
[21] Zerbe, Maximilian, Daniel Mörlein, and Stefan Josef Hörtenhuber. "Towards climate neutrality: Comparison of mitigation strategies for agricultural emissions using GWP100 and GWP* metrics." Environmental Challenges, vol. 18, p. 101060, 2025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2024.101060
Published
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Md. Sidratul Montaha Hossain , Abdullah Al Mahmood , M. Bodiul Islam (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All the articles published by this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
