Impact of Piezoelectric Material Length on Piezoelectric Cantilever Energy Harvesters: A Numerical Investigation

Authors

  • Md. Mohiuddin Department of Mechanical Engineering, Khulna University of Engineering & Technology, Khulna-9203, BANGLADESH
  • Mohammad Rafat Islam Department of Mechanical Engineering, Khulna University of Engineering & Technology, Khulna-9203, Bangladesh
  • Riaz Ahmed Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Green Bay Wisconsin, USA
  • Zahir U. Ahmed Department of Mechanical Engineering, Khulna University of Engineering & Technology, Khulna-9203, BANGLADESH

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38032/scse.2025.3.63

Keywords:

Piezoelectricity, Cantilever beam, Energy Harvesting, Piezoelectric Material

Abstract

The utilization of piezoelectric cantilever beam energy harvesters is widespread for extracting strain-based energy from vibrations. Ongoing research focuses on enhancing the power output of these energy harvesters. Piezoelectric material length is a vital variable that warrants investigation as it affects the output power. This study investigates the effects of changing the piezoelectric material's length while keeping the base beam and piezoelectric component's thickness and width constant. While maintaining a fixed base beam length, the inquiry modifies the length of the piezoelectric material. The piezoelectric material was positioned at the fixed end of the beam to attain maximum output power for each configuration. Furthermore, due to the dependence of the output power of piezoelectric energy harvesters on the optimal electrical load and resonance frequency, this study also analyzes these contributing elements. The result indicates that the maximum power density of 12.38 µW/mm³ is achieved at a resonant frequency of 40.7 Hz when the piezoelectric material spans the entire beam length. In contrast, the lowest power density, 10.46 µW/mm³, is observed when the resonant frequency reaches 56 Hz for a piezoelectric-to-beam length ratio of 2. These findings highlight that the highest power density, which is also cost-effective, is achieved by coating either a section near the fixed end or nearly the entire surface of the beam. When piezoelectric material is applied to half of the beam, the power density significantly decreases. The resonant frequency of the energy harvester exhibits a completely opposite trend compared to the output power density as the length of the piezoelectric material changes. Decreasing the length of the piezoelectric material leads to a reduction in capacitance, thereby causing an increase in optimal resistance.

Downloads

Downloads

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] S. Roundy, P. K. Wright, and J. Rabaey, “A study of low level vibrations as a power source for wireless sensor nodes,” Comput. Commun., vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 1131–1144, Jul. 2003.

[2] G. Zhang, S. Gao, H. Liu, and S. Niu, “A low frequency piezoelectric energy harvester with trapezoidal cantilever beam: theory and experiment,” Microsyst. Technol., vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 3457–3466, Aug. 2017.

[3] E. L. Pradeesh and S. Udhayakumar, “Investigation on the geometry of beams for piezoelectric energy harvester,” Microsyst. Technol., vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 3463–3475, Sep. 2019.

[4] M. Mohiuddin, Z. U. Ahmed, and R. Ahmed, “Influence of Beam Geometry on the Power Capacity of a Cantilever Beam Based Energy Harvester,” Vol. 6 Dyn. Vib. Control, Feb. 2024.

[5] M. Mohiuddin, K. M. Rahman, Z. Ahmed, and R. Ahmed, “Optimizing Power Density in Partially Coated Cantilever Beam Energy Harvesters: A Cost-Effective Design Strategy,” Energies 2024, Vol. 17, Page 5572, vol. 17, no. 22, p. 5572, Nov. 2024.

[6] A. H. Alameh, M. Gratuze, M. Y. Elsayed, and F. Nabki, “Effects of Proof Mass Geometry on Piezoelectric Vibration Energy Harvesters,” Sensors 2018, Vol. 18, Page 1584, vol. 18, no. 5, p. 1584, May 2018.

[7] M. Mohiuddin, Z. U. Ahmed, and R. Ahmed, “An Analysis of Concave and Convex Shaped Cantilever Beams On Vibration-Based Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting,” Vol. 11 36th Conf. Mech. Vib. Sound, Nov. 2024.

[8] S. Sunithamani and P. Lakshmi, “Experimental study and analysis of unimorph piezoelectric energy harvester with different substrate thickness and different proof mass shapes,” Microsyst. Technol., vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 2421–2430, Jul. 2017.

[9] Q. Wang, W. Dai, S. Li, J. A. S. Oh, and T. Wu, “Modelling and analysis of a piezoelectric unimorph cantilever for energy harvesting application,” Mater. Technol., vol. 35, no. 9–10, pp. 675–681, Aug. 2020.

[10] A. Erturk, P. A. Tarazaga, J. R. Farmer, and D. J. Inman, “Effect of strain nodes and electrode configuration on piezoelectric energy harvesting from cantilevered beams,” J. Vib. Acoust. Trans. ASME, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 0110101–01101011, Feb. 2009.

[11] E. L. Pradeesh and S. Udhayakumar, “Effect of placement of piezoelectric material and proof mass on the performance of piezoelectric energy harvester,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., vol. 130, pp. 664–676, Sep. 2019.

[12] L. Tang and J. Wang, “Size effect of tip mass on performance of cantilevered piezoelectric energy harvester with a dynamic magnifier,” Acta Mech., vol. 228, no. 11, pp. 3997–4015, Nov. 2017.

[13] X. Zhou, S. Gao, L. Jin, H. Liu, and P. Li, “Effects of changing PZT length on the performance of doubly-clamped piezoelectric energy harvester with different beam shapes under stochastic excitation,” Microsyst. Technol., vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 3799–3813, Sep. 2018.

[14] I. Izadgoshasb, Y. Y. Lim, N. Lake, L. Tang, R. V. Padilla, and T. Kashiwao, “Optimizing orientation of piezoelectric cantilever beam for harvesting energy from human walking,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 161, pp. 66–73, Apr. 2018.

[15] D. Benasciutti, L. Moro, S. Zelenika, and E. Brusa, “Vibration energy scavenging via piezoelectric bimorphs of optimized shapes,” Microsyst. Technol., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 657–668, May 2010.

Published

11.11.2025

How to Cite

[1]
M. Mohiuddin, M. R. Islam, R. Ahmed, and Z. U. Ahmed, “Impact of Piezoelectric Material Length on Piezoelectric Cantilever Energy Harvesters: A Numerical Investigation”, SCS:Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 243–247, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.38032/scse.2025.3.63.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 84

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.