Computational Study and Analysis of Carotid Artery Stenosis

Toukir Ahmed Chowdhury; Prasanjit Das

doi:10.38032/jea.2024.02.002

Authors

Toukir Ahmed Chowdhury Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology, Chattogram, Bangladesh
Prasanjit Das Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chittagong University of Engineering & Technology, Chattogram, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38032/jea.2024.02.002

Keywords:

Hemodynamics, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Blood Flow, Carotid Artery Stenosis, Atherosclerosis

Abstract

Heart diseases and strokes are the major causes of death both nationally and globally in recent years. Carotid artery stenosis is one of the leading causes of these disorders, along with many others. The constriction of the carotid artery, which provides blood to the head, face, and brain, causes this condition. This constriction happens due to a plaque buildup in the walls of the artery, a condition called atherosclerosis. A computational study on different degrees of stenosis on an artery, mild stenosis (30% stenotic artery) and moderate stenosis (70% stenotic artery) helps to analyze the blood flow patterns and behavior, identify different factors that may vary due to stenosis like – wall shear stress, velocity profile, and pressure distribution. The viscosity coefficient of blood, a non-Newtonian fluid, depends on the shear rate. Two non-Newtonian fluid flow models, Carreau and Cross models, are taken into account for its analysis, and the numerical computation was carried out using ANSYS WORKBENCH ACADEMIC STUDENT 2022 R2 with user-defined function for pulsatile blood flow consideration. This study is expected to aid the physicians and medical practitioners, as it shows the proportional relation between pressure and stenosis severity, identifies the more stenosis prone areas through analysis and personalize treatment plans. It also depicts how Cross model predicts higher WSS values compared to the Carreau model, and so has more reliability for higher severity of stenosis.

References

“The top 10 causes of death,” World Health Organization, Dec. 09, 2020. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death (accessed Sep. 23, 2023).

“Report on Bangladesh Sample Vital Statistics 2018,” May 2019. Accessed: Sep. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://bbs.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/bbs.portal.gov.bd/page/6a40a397_6ef7_48a3_80b3_78b8d1223e3f/SVRS_Report_2018_29-05-2019%28Final%29.pdf

“Heart attacks the most common cause of death in Bangladesh last year: BBS,” The Daily Star, Mar. 10, 2021. https://www.thedailystar.net/bangladesh/news/heart-attacks-the-most-common-cause-death-bangladesh-last-year-bbs-2058233 (accessed Sep. 23, 2023).

“Atherosclerosis,” Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. Apr. 23, 2020. Accessed: Sep. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.britannica.com/science/atherosclerosis

“Carotid Stenosis,” Temple Health, Jun. 28, 2021. https://www.templehealth.org/services/conditions/carotid-stenosis (accessed Sep. 23, 2023).

Köhler, U., Marshall, I., Robertson, M.B., Long, Q., Xu, X.Y. and Hoskins, P.R., 2001. MRI measurement of wall shear stress vectors in bifurcation models and comparison with CFD predictions. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Official Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 14(5), pp.563-573.

Marshall, I., Zhao, S., Papathanasopoulou, P., Hoskins, P. and Xu, X.Y., 2004. MRI and CFD studies of pulsatile flow in healthy and stenosed carotid bifurcation models. Journal of Biomechanics, 37(5), pp.679-687.

Tu, J., Wong, K.K., Cheung, S.C., Beare, R. and Phan, T., 2011. Analysis of patient-specific carotid bifurcation models using computational fluid dynamics. Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics, 1(2), pp.116-125.

Khader, A.S., Shenoy, S.B., Pai, R.B., Kamath, G.S., Sharif, N.M. and Rao, V.R.K., 2011. Effect of increased severity in patient specific stenosis of common carotid artery using CFD—a case study. World journal of Modelling and Simulation, 7(2), pp.113-122.

Li, M.X., Beech-Brandt, J.J., John, L.R., Hoskins, P.R. and Easson, W.J., 2007. Numerical analysis of pulsatile blood flow and vessel wall mechanics in different degrees of stenoses. Journal of Biomechanics, 40(16), pp.3715-3724.

Chua, C.S., Sheard, G.J., Ryan, K. and Fouras, A., 2008. Changes in flow and wall stresses through arterial constrictions offset from the centre of the vessel. Anziam Journal, 50, pp.C744-C759.

Li, Z.Y., Taviani, V., Tang, T., Sadat, U., Young, V., Patterson, A., Graves, M. and Gillard, J.H., 2009. The mechanical triggers of plaque rupture: shear stress vs pressure gradient. The British journal of radiology, 82(special_issue_1), pp.S39-S45.

Lorenzini, G. and Casalena, E., 2008. CFD analysis of pulsatile blood flow in an atherosclerotic human artery with eccentric plaques. Journal of Biomechanics, 41(9), pp.1862-1870.

Mandal, P.K., 2005. An unsteady analysis of non-Newtonian blood flow through tapered arteries with a stenosis. International Journal of Non-linear Mechanics, 40(1), pp.151-164.

Cho, Y.I. and Kensey, K.R., 1991. Effects of the non-Newtonian viscosity of blood on flows in a diseased arterial vessel. Part 1: Steady flows. Biorheology, 28(3-4), pp.241-262.

Johnston, B.M., Johnston, P.R., Corney, S. and Kilpatrick, D., 2004. Non-Newtonian blood flow in human right coronary arteries: steady state simulations. Journal of biomechanics, 37(5), pp.709-720.

Gijsen, F.J., van de Vosse, F.N. and Janssen, J.D., 1999. The influence of the non-Newtonian properties of blood on the flow in large arteries: steady flow in a carotid bifurcation model. Journal of biomechanics, 32(6), pp.601-608.

Formaggia, L., Lamponi, D. and Quarteroni, A., 2003. One-dimensional models for blood flow in arteries. Journal of engineering mathematics, 47, pp.251-276.

Lee, K.W. and Xu, X.Y., 2002. Modelling of flow and wall behaviour in a mildly stenosed tube. Medical Engineering & Physics, 24(9), pp.575-586.

Ramdan, S.A., Rasani, M.R., Subramaniam, T., Muda, A.S., Aziz, A.F.A., Ya, T.M.Y.S.T., Moria, H., Tahir, M.F.M. and Nuawi, M.Z., 2022. Blood flow acoustics in carotid artery. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 94(1), pp.28-44.

Bouteloup, H., de Oliveira Marinho, J.G. and Espino, D.M., 2020. Computational analysis to predict the effect of pre-bifurcation stenosis on the hemodynamics of the internal and external carotid arteries. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Sciences, 14(3), pp.7029-7039.

Nagargoje, M. and Gupta, R., 2020. Effect of sinus size and position on hemodynamics during pulsatile flow in a carotid artery bifurcation. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 192, p.105440.

Lopes, D., Puga, H., Teixeira, J.C. and Teixeira, S.F., 2019. Influence of arterial mechanical properties on carotid blood flow: Comparison of CFD and FSI studies. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 160, pp.209-218.

Sia, S.F., Zhao, X., Yu, Y. and Zhang, Y., 2019. Multiphase particle-in-cell simulation in severe internal carotid artery stenosis. Powder Technology, 358, pp.62-67.

Lee, S.H., Han, K.S., Hur, N., Cho, Y.I. and Jeong, S.K., 2019. The effect of patient-specific non-Newtonian blood viscosity on arterial hemodynamics predictions. Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology, 19(08), p.1940054.

Azar, D., Torres, W.M., Davis, L.A., Shaw, T., Eberth, J.F., Kolachalama, V.B., Lessner, S.M. and Shazly, T., 2019. Geometric determinants of local hemodynamics in severe carotid artery stenosis. Computers in biology and medicine, 114, p.103436.

Yao, X., Dai, Z., Zhang, X., Gao, J., Xu, G., Cai, Y. and Li, Z., 2019. Carotid Geometry as a Predictor of In-Stent Neointimal Hyperplasia―A Computational Fluid Dynamics Study―. Circulation Journal, 83(7), pp.1472-1479.

Kumar, N., Khader, A., Pai, R., Kyriacou, P., Khan, S. and Koteshwara, P., 2019. Computational fluid dynamic study on effect of Carreau-Yasuda and Newtonian blood viscosity models on hemodynamic parameters. Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering, 19(2), pp.465-477.

Li, C.H., Gao, B.L., Wang, J.W., Liu, J.F., Li, H. and Yang, S.T., 2019. Hemodynamic factors affecting carotid sinus atherosclerotic stenosis. World neurosurgery, 121, pp.e262-e276.

Guerciotti, B. and Vergara, C., 2018. Computational comparison between Newtonian and non-Newtonian blood rheologies in stenotic vessels. Biomedical Technology: Modeling, Experiments and Simulation, pp.169-183.

Domanin, M., Bissacco, D., Le Van, D. and Vergara, C., 2018. Computational fluid dynamic comparison between patch-based and primary closure techniques after carotid endarterectomy. Journal of vascular surgery, 67(3), pp.887-897.

Urevc, J., Žun, I., Brumen, M. and Štok, B., 2017. Modeling the effect of red blood cells deformability on blood flow conditions in human carotid artery bifurcation. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 139(1), p.011011.

Bit, A., Ghagare, D., Rizvanov, A.A. and Chattopadhyay, H., 2017. Assessment of influences of stenoses in right carotid artery on left carotid artery using wall stress marker. BioMed research international, 2017(1), p.2935195.

Conti, M., Long, C., Marconi, M., Berchiolli, R., Bazilevs, Y. and Reali, A., 2016. Carotid artery hemodynamics before and after stenting: A patient specific CFD study. Computers & fluids, 141, pp.62-74.

Gallo, D., Steinman, D.A. and Morbiducci, U., 2016. Insights into the co-localization of magnitude-based versus direction-based indicators of disturbed shear at the carotid bifurcation. Journal of biomechanics, 49(12), pp.2413-2419.

Sousa, L.C., Castro, C.F., António, C.C., Sousa, F., Santos, R., Castro, P. and Azevedo, E., 2016. Computational simulation of carotid stenosis and flow dynamics based on patient ultrasound data–A new tool for risk assessment and surgical planning. Advances in Medical Sciences, 61(1), pp.32-39.

Gharahi, H., Zambrano, B.A., Zhu, D.C., DeMarco, J.K. and Baek, S., 2016. Computational fluid dynamic simulation of human carotid artery bifurcation based on anatomy and volumetric blood flow rate measured with magnetic resonance imaging. International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics, 8, pp.46-60.

Guerciotti, B., Vergara, C., Azzimonti, L., Forzenigo, L., Buora, A., Biondetti, P. and Domanin, M., 2016. Computational study of the fluid-dynamics in carotids before and after endarterectomy. Journal of biomechanics, 49(1), pp.26-38.

Siebert, M.W. and Fodor, P.S., 2009, October. Newtonian and non-newtonian blood flow over a backward-facing step–a case study. In Proceedings of the COMSOL Conference, Boston (Vol. 27).

Molla, M.M. and Paul, M.C., 2012. LES of non-Newtonian physiological blood flow in a model of arterial stenosis. Medical engineering & physics, 34(8), pp.1079-1087.

Sinnott, M., Cleary, P.W. and Prakash, M., 2006, December. An investigation of pulsatile blood flow in a bifurcation artery using a grid-free method. In Proc. Fifth International Conference on CFD in the Process Industries (pp. 1-6).